Editors' Response to Johnson
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Response to Johnson and Danhauer
We thank Johnson and Danhauer for pointing out our oversight of calling the ED-NST the CUNY-NST. The nonsense syllable test that we used in the Auriemmo et al (2009) study was indeed the Edgerton-Danhauer Nonsense Syllable Test (ED-NST), which we have referenced correctly throughout the manuscript. We also agree with Johnson and Danhauer on the requisite considerations in administering an open-...
متن کاملAuthor's Response to Reviews Bmc Cancer Editors
We did collect information on occupation. We had twenty different occupations reported and the most common responses were homemaker, farmer, construction, clerk, nurse, and seller. These six professions accounted for about 75% of the subjects and none of these has an a priori likelihood of having high PAH exposures. We did plot 1-OHPG by job and found no suggestions of interesting results. Ther...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Infectious Diseases
سال: 2014
ISSN: 0022-1899,1537-6613
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiu212